Baby Sloths—Cute Enough To Temporarily Stun

Posted by J. P. Cabit ⋅ January 10, 2012 ⋅ 2 Comments

Filed Under lazy, sloth, slothful, time-suck, timesuck, twitter

My word. Did you hear that scream at :22? Breaks my heart.

Proof that God knew the definition of “Cute” before we even knew it was a word.

I found this little gem by linking off of a Twitter tweet. And, as I sat there watching it, letting my time get sucked into this…this black hole, I thought to myself, “There’s gotta be a blog post in here somewhere.”

“There’s just gotta. Gotta.”

And guess what? There is!

Draw your own lessons from this post!

About J. P. Cabit

Unpublished and unfamous, but undaunted, Joseph Cabit presses on toward his prize: the Newberry award. Trying to publish his first novel.

View all posts by J. P. Cabit »

Discussion

2 Responses to “Baby Sloths—Cute Enough To Temporarily Stun”

An equation substituting Fb for variable Twtr will tally about the same, methinks. In fact, that may apply to most figures included in the internet set.
Still, one could waste time in worse ways than cooing over darling baby sloths.

Posted by deshipley | January 11, 2012, 22:47

Reply to this comment
- This is true, this is true. In fact, I think we can go so far as to say—
  
  (Wrtr + Twtr = BbySlth) < (Wrtr + Fb = BbySlth)
  
  Posted by J. P. Cabit | January 12, 2012, 06:07
  
  Reply to this comment